|
|
Post by ツイン スモール Urufu on Sept 18, 2024 11:22:27 GMT
What are they not trying to hide really? It is difficult to say if they are incompetent, evil, or both, but anyway they are cowards who fear any opposition at all. I get that, but a sudden big censorship push feels odd. It may be election related, but perhaps it's grasping at straws due to public opinion shifting concerning all things woke. Part of Agenda 2030 is the "decentralization of information databases". Basically they want to carve out regions of internet that you need special keys to communicate between. You can read more about it here: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800919303258 |
|
|
|
Post by beoran on Sept 18, 2024 14:02:32 GMT
Normally decentralization is good for us. Terrible how they are trying to abuse it. China style firewalls everywhere???
|
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 18, 2024 14:33:16 GMT
To me, and I only read a little, this seems like basically limiting public information flow to "approved channels." Approved channels would be those that they have a stranglehold on.
Did they already give up on the net ID thing they were trying to push so hard for a while ago? Perhaps that would be part of it. You would only be authorized to view what you have permission to.
We'd have to see how it all works, though. Do keep in mind that Agenda 2030 used to be Agenda 21 (for 2021), but it wasn't successful enough. I imagine much of it may fall apart, and I mean may, as the real hardliners age and die.
|
|
|
|
Post by ツイン スモール Urufu on Sept 19, 2024 2:22:28 GMT
To me, and I only read a little, this seems like basically limiting public information flow to "approved channels." Approved channels would be those that they have a stranglehold on. Did they already give up on the net ID thing they were trying to push so hard for a while ago? Perhaps that would be part of it. You would only be authorized to view what you have permission to. We'd have to see how it all works, though. Do keep in mind that Agenda 2030 used to be Agenda 21 (for 2021), but it wasn't successful enough. I imagine much of it may fall apart, and I mean may, as the real hardliners age and die. It didn't. Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 are separate globalist policies entirely. They represent "milestones" that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) would pass on their way to the new world (whether building back better or otherwise). Agenda 21 was penned in '92. Agenda 2030 came out in 2015 after the completion of the Millennium Development Goals which ran from 2000 to 2015. |
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 19, 2024 3:27:23 GMT
To me, and I only read a little, this seems like basically limiting public information flow to "approved channels." Approved channels would be those that they have a stranglehold on. Did they already give up on the net ID thing they were trying to push so hard for a while ago? Perhaps that would be part of it. You would only be authorized to view what you have permission to. We'd have to see how it all works, though. Do keep in mind that Agenda 2030 used to be Agenda 21 (for 2021), but it wasn't successful enough. I imagine much of it may fall apart, and I mean may, as the real hardliners age and die. It didn't. Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 are separate globalist policies entirely. They represent "milestones" that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) would pass on their way to the new world (whether building back better or otherwise). Agenda 21 was penned in '92. Agenda 2030 came out in 2015 after the completion of the Millennium Development Goals which ran from 2000 to 2015. But wasn't 2030 penned in 2015 when it was obvious that the 2021 goals weren't going to make it? I believe the goals outlined in 21 were extremely similar to those in the 2030 plan. |
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 19, 2024 13:40:15 GMT
On the topic of online/digital ID and such, I don't think it can exist as things are now. You would have to get rid of the illegal immigrant population as a whole. You can say that you have to sign up for it to get food/net usage. However, South Americans live in situations where it's multiple-family households, and only one needs to get the ID, or at least one family. They might have to claim one for each dependent, but that leaves too many people unaccounted for and unauthorized use.
|
|
|
|
Post by beoran on Sept 19, 2024 16:13:45 GMT
There are ways to do it with a $1 ID device like some banks use, but I will not discuss those in detail as to not encourage those listening in. Or they might start asking age verification for almost everything. We can only teach those around us the value of online privacy. And pray.
And besides the powers that be do not care much as much about controlling their philistines as they do care about controlling the middle class. As in 1984 the upper class wants to control the middle class, they don't worry that much about the lower class since they can be pushed around more easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 19, 2024 23:37:18 GMT
There are ways to do it with a $1 ID device like some banks use, but I will not discuss those in detail as to not encourage those listening in. Or they might start asking age verification for almost everything. We can only teach those around us the value of online privacy. And pray. And besides the powers that be do not care much as much about controlling their philistines as they do care about controlling the middle class. As in 1984 the upper class wants to control the middle class, they don't worry that much about the lower class since they can be pushed around more easily. True. However, if there are avenues for the lower class to avoid detection and subvert the system, anyone can use them. Besides, I think the middle class, as it once was, is eroding dramatically- dividing into the rich and serfs. |
|
|
|
Post by ツイン スモール Urufu on Sept 20, 2024 23:24:34 GMT
It didn't. Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 are separate globalist policies entirely. They represent "milestones" that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) would pass on their way to the new world (whether building back better or otherwise). Agenda 21 was penned in '92. Agenda 2030 came out in 2015 after the completion of the Millennium Development Goals which ran from 2000 to 2015. But wasn't 2030 penned in 2015 when it was obvious that the 2021 goals weren't going to make it? I believe the goals outlined in 21 were extremely similar to those in the 2030 plan. No, the 2030 goals are by a different council than the 2021 goals. They applied concurrently. You could say that Agenda 21 was an overarching framework within which the SDG (which comprised both the millennium goals and Agenda 2030) operated. On the surface, a new group of UN bureaucrats wanted to put their stamp on the world and so got together to make shorter-lived (15 year) globalist nonsense within the framework of the multi-decade agendas already in place. |
|
|
|
Post by beoran on Sept 21, 2024 13:19:20 GMT
Remember that we are fighting against the princes and powers of this world. These forces of evil have been at it for thousands of years, these agenda are only tools to attain their goals: total moral inversion. Murder, adultery, pederasty, fornication, stealing, witchcraft, abortion, all these must become *mandatory*. They want it to become impossible to live without committing grave sins, to ruin us all and to estrange us from God.
|
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 21, 2024 14:55:12 GMT
I would say, currently, they're very preoccupied with tearing down society bit by bit so they can rebuild it in the image they want (the NWO / antichrist kingdom).
|
|
|
|
Post by beoran on Sept 22, 2024 12:29:55 GMT
The main thing that is slowing them down is that they still need to wear a mask of "ethics", a pretense of the high ground. Like Juiche in North Korea, the UN has the SDGs for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 22, 2024 18:28:40 GMT
The main thing that is slowing them down is that they still need to wear a mask of "ethics", a pretense of the high ground. Like Juiche in North Korea, the UN has the SDGs for this. I think part of it is a mask of ethics. On the other hand, they realize if they move too fast, they'll get pushback. It's like how they pushed woke stuff too hard, and now they've had to take a step back. |
|
|
|
Post by beoran on Sept 24, 2024 6:49:50 GMT
That too. It is easier for example to popularize witchcraft than murder. Look at how many nonfiction books are published promoting witchcraft these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Liquid_Boss on Sept 24, 2024 14:29:42 GMT
That too. It is easier for example to popularize witchcraft than murder. Look at how many nonfiction books are published promoting witchcraft these days. I rarely read newer books. Though, this stuff has been pushed since the 70s and before. Witchcraft really kind of started stirring up in the late 1800s/early 1900s with seances and such. |
|
